Last week, I posted something that got a lot of attention:

"Take two weeks and accomplish more than most do in 6 months: Use Claude Code to build a simple SaaS, create 20 keyword-focused landing pages, optimize for SEO, add analytics, reduce friction, watch users, and optimize based on feedback. Put in 10-12 hour days. You'll come out transformed."

The response was immediate. Hundreds of replies. DMs asking for details. People wanting to know if this actually works.

It does work. But not for the reasons you think.

You're not building the next unicorn startup. You're forcing yourself through an intensive learning cycle that compresses 6 months of knowledge into 14 days.

And yes, I'm doing it myself. Right now. This week.

Better yet, I just finished my own 2-week sprint and built a fully functional SaaS (a vibe marketing tool launching soon). The experience confirmed what I suspected: the sprint works, but it's harder than you think.

Lessons from actually doing it (not just planning it)

I shared 15 insights from my 2-week build. The most important ones:

"The first 10 days were the easiest,the hardest is getting the final pieces over the finish line."

Everyone thinks building features is the hard part. Wrong. Getting something production-ready is where the real work happens.

"Record user sessions, paste transcript back to Claude Code...this was so helpful to fix now obvious issues."

You can't guess what users will struggle with. You have to watch them break your product and then fix it.

"Step back and simplify, at first I was over engineering for an initial v1 -- claude will do this."

Claude is smart enough to build complex solutions. You have to be smart enough to ask for simple ones.

"The biggest challenge is that it turned into a LOT MORE WORK than I thought to build something production level."

The demo works in 2 days. Making it secure, scalable, and user-friendly takes the other 12.

Why the two-week sprint actually works

Most people spend months "getting ready" to build something.

They research tools for weeks. Read blog posts about best practices. Take courses on entrepreneurship. Plan the perfect product.

Then they never start.

The two-week sprint forces you to skip all that and just build.

You don't have time to overthink. You can't research every tool option. You have to pick something and move forward.

Claude Code makes this possible in a way that wasn't feasible even a year ago. You can literally describe what you want to build, and it writes functional code. No computer science degree required.

The magic happens in the constraint.

When you only have 14 days, you focus on what actually matters: building something people want and getting it in front of them quickly.

The exact blueprint (because you asked)

Day-by-day breakdown from my actual sprint:

Days 1-2: Foundation

  • Pick a boring service with proven demand (don't innovate)

  • Use Claude Code in terminal as your workhorse

  • Get basic functionality working, don't worry about polish

Days 3-5: Core Features

  • Build MVP with Claude Code handling the heavy lifting

  • Use GPT-5 for bug fixes and feature mapping (catches details Claude misses)

  • Set up Neon database with Drizzle ORM (easiest path for AI to write migrations)

Days 6-8: User Experience

  • Spin up Claude subagents for UX, UI, and brand improvements

  • Implement Clerk for authentication (really easy integration)

  • Let Claude cook on UI design without over-directing (works better than micromanaging)

Days 9-11: The Hard Part

  • Record 5 user sessions and paste transcripts to Claude Code

  • Fix all the "obvious" issues that weren't obvious to you

  • Use Claude Code to identify security vulnerabilities, but get extra feedback from a senior engineer

Days 12-14: Production Polish

  • Integrate Stripe for payments (tried LemonSqueezy and others, Stripe is still easiest)

  • Constant refreshes of current_status.md files to keep aligned with Claude

  • Ship something that actually works for real users

Pro tips from my experience:

  • When stuck in a "vibe vortex," update your .md files, have Claude summarize current issues, and start a fresh session

  • Use Opus 4.1 as the main workhorse, but GPT-5 catches key details Opus misses

  • Ask Claude to find the most direct path and elegant solutions (it will over-engineer if you let it)

  • The biggest challenge: those final production-level pieces need an engineer's perspective

The tools that actually work:

  • Claude Code (Opus 4.1) - Main development workhorse

  • GPT-5 - Bug fixes and detail catching

  • Neon + Drizzle ORM - Database that plays nice with AI

  • Clerk - Authentication without headaches

  • Stripe - Payments that just work

Total cost: Under $100 for the two weeks.

What you'll actually learn (beyond coding)

The code is just the surface level. What really happens during those 14 days:

You learn to ship imperfect things

Most people never launch because they're waiting for perfection. The sprint forces you to ship something that works, not something perfect.

You understand user behavior

Watching real people use your product is humbling. Everything you think is obvious isn't. Every assumption you made is wrong.

You develop judgment about what matters

When you only have 14 days, you quickly learn the difference between nice-to-have and must-have features.

You build confidence in your ability to figure things out

Going from idea to working product in two weeks using tools you'd never touched before changes something fundamental.

You learn the difference between "working" and "production-ready."

Your first version will work. Your users will break it in ways you never imagined.

You understand that the last 20% takes 80% of the effort.

Features are easy. Security, error handling, and edge cases are hard.

And most importantly…

You prove to yourself that you can build things

That changes how you see opportunities. Instead of thinking "I wish someone would build X," you start thinking "I could build X."

The boring businesses that actually work

Don't try to build the next Facebook. Build something boring that people already pay for.

Some ideas that work:

  • Simple invoicing for freelancers

  • Appointment scheduling for local businesses

  • Basic inventory tracking for small retailers

  • Newsletter signup forms with one smart feature

  • Simple project tracking for teams under 10 people

The key: Pick something where people are already using spreadsheets or paying $50/month for an overcomplicated solution.

Your goal isn't to disrupt an industry. Build something slightly better than the current bad options.

Start your own sprint this weekend

You don't need to quit your job or invest thousands of dollars.

This weekend:

  1. Pick one boring problem you personally face

  2. Spend 2 hours with Claude Code building a basic solution

  3. If it works, commit to the 14-day sprint

  4. If it doesn't, try a different problem

The worst case? You spend 14 days learning skills that make you more valuable.

The best case? You build something people want and are willing to pay for.

Either way, you'll be different on the other side.

Most people spend years thinking about building something. You can spend two weeks actually doing it.

The tools are ready. The question is: are you?

— The Boring Marketer

What the Boring Marketer has been reading—and writing—this week.

Let's Get Boring

Work with us or follow along:

Follow us on X if you don’t already. We’re dropping “boring” stuff on the daily.

How else can we help? Feedback? Have a question? Reply to this email.

I read every single message.

Know someone who would like this email? Forward it to a friend.

Keep reading

No posts found